Akademiai Kiado Zrt.

Budapest, Hungary · Member ID: 425 · 45,138 total works

Global Rank

#2,186

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 8%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2184Portland Press Ltd.(40 pts)#2185AIP Publishing(40 pts)#2187International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP)(40 pts)#2188The Korean Institute of Metals and Materials(40 pts)

Nexus Score

40/ 100

+27 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#1,033

4,929 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,186

40,209 works

Ranked #1,033 for recent publications vs #2,186 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

17.7 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

6.1 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.4 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

1.6 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

10.8 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	30	F	63%	12%	19%	4%	40%
Journal Issues	12	F	20%	0%	0%	0%	34%
Monographs	0	F	0%	1%	0%	0%	0%
Edited Books	0	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	79%	11.8 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	90%	4.5 / 5	Excellent
Similarity Check provenance	90%	4.5 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	55%	10.9 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	85%	4.3 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	15%	1.5 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	12%	1.2 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	55%	3.8 / 7	Good
Full-text Links access	90%	6.3 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	75%	4.5 / 6	Good

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+14 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 8% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+10 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 31% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+9 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 23% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Akademiai Kiado Zrt.

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve People

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Increase ORCID Coverage

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Deposit Complete References

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results