International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP)

College Station, TX, United States · Member ID: 1029 · 10,662 total works

Global Rank

#2,187

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 8%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2185AIP Publishing(40 pts)#2186Akademiai Kiado Zrt.(40 pts)#2188The Korean Institute of Metals and Materials(40 pts)#2189AOSIS(40 pts)

Nexus Score

40/ 100

+72 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#32

155 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,187

10,507 works

Ranked #32 for recent publications vs #2,187 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

9.8 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

10.0 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

4.7 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

8.8 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

6.4 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
ReportsTOP	20	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	0%
Edited Books	20	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	0%
Monographs	7	F	13%	11%	2%	6%	2%
Book Chapters	5	F	7%	4%	1%	5%	4%
Datasets	2	F	7%	0%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	88%	13.3 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	93%	4.7 / 5	Excellent
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	97%	19.5 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	92%	9.2 / 10	Excellent
Funder Registry funding	87%	8.7 / 10	Excellent
Award Numbers funding	81%	8.1 / 10	Excellent
Licenses access	92%	6.4 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	85%	5.9 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	0%	0.0 / 6	Poor

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Provenance

+10 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 39% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+10 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 32% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+7 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 31% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP)

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Provenance

Improve Access

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Include Abstracts

Include Author Affiliations

Enable Similarity Check

Deposit Complete References

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results