AIP Publishing

Melville, NY, United States · Member ID: 317 · 1,007,572 total works

Global Rank

#2,185

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 8%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2183Human Kinetics(40 pts)#2184Portland Press Ltd.(40 pts)#2186Akademiai Kiado Zrt.(40 pts)#2187International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP)(40 pts)

Nexus Score

39/ 100

+16 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#2,200

84,158 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,185

923,414 works

Ranked #2,200 for recent publications vs #2,185 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

20.4 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

6.2 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

2.8 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

5.2 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

4.8 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	42	D	93%	20%	31%	20%	31%
Other	36	D	20%	100%	33%	0%	30%
Book Chapters	25	F	41%	34%	25%	0%	20%
Edited Books	18	F	0%	37%	28%	0%	30%
Monographs	13	F	0%	45%	29%	0%	0%
Proceedings	10	F	40%	0%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	94%	14.2 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	54%	2.7 / 5	Good
Similarity Check provenance	97%	4.8 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	51%	10.1 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	44%	2.2 / 5	Needs Work
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	41%	4.2 / 10	Needs Work
Award Numbers funding	40%	4.0 / 10	Needs Work
Licenses access	20%	1.4 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	10%	0.7 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	53%	3.2 / 6	Good

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+11 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 26% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+11 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 24% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+10 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 31% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

AIP Publishing

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Access

Improve People

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add License Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Increase ORCID Coverage

Include Author Affiliations

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results