Eötvös Loránd University

Budapest, Hungary · Member ID: 9324 · 10,693 total works

Global Rank

#10,255

of 28,364

Percentile

Top 36%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+18

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#10253Pulmonary Hypertension Association(20 pts)#10254Scientific and Literature Open Access Publishing(20 pts)#10256Polskie Towarzystwo Teologiczne Sekcja Wydawnicza(20 pts)#10257I-PECEGE(20 pts)

Nexus Score

19/ 100

+8 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#10,816

2,577 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#10,255

8,116 works

Ranked #10,816 for recent publications vs #10,255 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

3.6 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

7.0 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

8.5 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
ReportsTOP	19	F	0%	88%	0%	0%	5%
Journal Articles	19	F	15%	27%	0%	0%	48%
Monographs	15	F	6%	58%	0%	0%	10%
Edited Books	12	F	1%	57%	0%	0%	3%
Book Chapters	10	F	1%	46%	0%	0%	2%
Books	8	F	0%	37%	0%	0%	2%
Proceedings	7	F	0%	35%	0%	0%	0%
Dissertations	0	F	0%	1%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	10%	1.6 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	56%	2.8 / 5	Good
ORCID Coverage people	48%	9.6 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	1%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	1%	0.1 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	22%	1.5 / 7	Needs Work
Full-text Links access	53%	3.7 / 7	Good
Abstracts access	61%	3.6 / 6	Good

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Provenance

+16 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 15% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Eötvös Loránd University

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Provenance

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Add License Information

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results