Scientific and Literature Open Access Publishing

London, United Kingdom · Member ID: 9207 · 3,252 total works

Global Rank

#10,254

of 28,364

Percentile

Top 36%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+17

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#10252Fondo de Cultura Economica(20 pts)#10253Pulmonary Hypertension Association(20 pts)#10255Eötvös Loránd University(20 pts)#10256Polskie Towarzystwo Teologiczne Sekcja Wydawnicza(20 pts)

Nexus Score

20/ 100

Stable vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#13,259

428 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#10,254

2,824 works

Ranked #13,259 for recent publications vs #10,254 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

3.9 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

0.4 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

15.3 / 20

Score by Content Type

All works are journal articles — the aggregate score above is accurate.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	2%	0.3 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	74%	3.7 / 5	Good
ORCID Coverage people	0%	0.0 / 20	Poor
Affiliations (Text) organizations	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	79%	5.5 / 7	Good
Full-text Links access	74%	5.2 / 7	Good
Abstracts access	79%	4.7 / 6	Good

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Provenance

+16 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 16% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+16 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 2% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Scientific and Literature Open Access Publishing

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Provenance

Improve People

Improve Funding

Improvement Recommendations

Increase ORCID Coverage

Deposit Complete References

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results