Kemerovo State University

Kemerovo, Russia · Member ID: 9053 · 5,123 total works

Global Rank

#2,803

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 10%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2801Revista Elo - Dialogos em Extensao(37 pts)#2802Gatha Cognition(37 pts)#2804Conselho Federal de Enfermagem - Cofen(37 pts)#2805Logeion Filosofia da Informacao(37 pts)

Nexus Score

37/ 100

+14 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#3,253

1,088 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,803

4,035 works

Ranked #3,253 for recent publications vs #2,803 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

16.9 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

7.6 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

4.3 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

7.7 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	34	F	65%	28%	27%	0%	40%
Proceedings	33	F	68%	42%	22%	0%	23%
Books	26	F	59%	9%	29%	0%	27%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	95%	14.3 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	97%	4.8 / 5	Excellent
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	56%	11.2 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	94%	4.7 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	5%	0.5 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	18%	1.2 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	18%	1.2 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	94%	5.6 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+8 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 38% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+8 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 29% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Kemerovo State University

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve People

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Add Funder Information

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Add License Information

Add Full-Text URLs

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results