Gatha Cognition

Akole, Maharashtra, India · Member ID: 8966 · 333 total works

Global Rank

#2,802

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 10%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2800VFAST Research Platform(37 pts)#2801Revista Elo - Dialogos em Extensao(37 pts)#2803Kemerovo State University(37 pts)#2804Conselho Federal de Enfermagem - Cofen(37 pts)

Nexus Score

36/ 100

+19 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#2,575

19 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,802

314 works

Ranked #2,575 for recent publications vs #2,802 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

17.1 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

9.8 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.6 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

1.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

5.0 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	48	D	99%	58%	33%	4%	31%
Journals	5	F	20%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Book Chapters	5	F	20%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Edited Books	5	F	20%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Reference Books	3	F	13%	0%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	79%	11.8 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	79%	4.0 / 5	Good
Similarity Check provenance	74%	3.7 / 5	Good
ORCID Coverage people	68%	13.7 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	79%	4.0 / 5	Good
ROR IDs organizations	5%	0.5 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	11%	1.1 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	5%	0.5 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	32%	2.2 / 7	Needs Work
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	79%	4.7 / 6	Good

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+15 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 5% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+11 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 25% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+8 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 24% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Gatha Cognition

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Access

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Add Full-Text URLs

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Add License Information

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results