University of Business Engineering and Management Banja Luka

Banja Luka, Bosnia & Herzegovina · Member ID: 52766 · 204 total works

Global Rank

#2,367

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 8%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2365Toplica Academy of Applied Studies(40 pts)#2366Secretaria de Saúde do Estado do Rio de Janeiro(40 pts)#2368Centre for Productivity and Sustainability Analysis(40 pts)#2369Tobruk University(40 pts)

Nexus Score

39/ 100

-3 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#4,348

109 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,367

95 works

Ranked #4,348 for recent publications vs #2,367 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

16.7 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

2.0 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

9.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

11.8 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	42	D	77%	8%	57%	0%	64%
Proceedings	35	D	49%	15%	65%	0%	51%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	70%	10.5 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	66%	3.3 / 5	Good
ORCID Coverage people	20%	4.0 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	47%	2.3 / 5	Needs Work
ROR IDs organizations	72%	7.2 / 10	Good
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	66%	4.6 / 7	Good
Abstracts access	100%	6.0 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+14 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 10% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+4 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 59% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

University of Business Engineering and Management Banja Luka

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve People

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Increase ORCID Coverage

Add Funder Information

Add License Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Enable Crossmark

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results