University of London Press

London, United Kingdom · Member ID: 53060 · 136 total works

Global Rank

#2,564

of 28,379

Percentile

Top 9%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2562Muzeum Narodowe w Warszawie(39 pts)#2563Mimosa Education Services(39 pts)#2565Science and Technology Limited(39 pts)#2566International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion(39 pts)

Nexus Score

39/ 100

+13 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#2,822

31 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,564

105 works

Ranked #2,822 for recent publications vs #2,564 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

9.0 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

6.1 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

5.3 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.3 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

18.2 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
MonographsTOP	37	D	39%	20%	22%	2%	97%
Edited Books	36	D	36%	22%	21%	3%	92%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	0%	0.0 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	94%	4.7 / 5	Excellent
Similarity Check provenance	77%	3.9 / 5	Good
ORCID Coverage people	48%	9.7 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	77%	3.9 / 5	Good
ROR IDs organizations	55%	5.5 / 10	Good
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	90%	6.3 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	77%	5.4 / 7	Good
Abstracts access	100%	6.0 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 1% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+11 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 36% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+10 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 30% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

University of London Press

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve People

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Increase ORCID Coverage

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results