RN Score

Korean Society for Food Engineering

Anseong-si, Gangseo-gu, South Korea · Member ID: 5213 · 1,369 total works

Nexus Score

48/ 100
D
+32 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#261

64

83 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#658

32

1,286 works

Ranked #261 for recent publications vs #658 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

19.4 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

6.8 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

6.6 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

15.6 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

All works are journal articles — the aggregate score above is accurate.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

99%
14.8 / 15Excellent

Update Policies

provenance

77%
3.9 / 5Good

Similarity Check

provenance

99%
4.9 / 5Excellent

ORCID Coverage

people

67%
13.5 / 20Good

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

ROR IDs

organizations

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Funder Registry

funding

52%
5.2 / 10Good

Award Numbers

funding

45%
4.5 / 10Needs Work

Licenses

access

69%
4.8 / 7Good

Full-text Links

access

99%
6.9 / 7Excellent

Abstracts

access

99%
5.9 / 6Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

2

Improve People

+9 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 34% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
3

Improve Funding

+9 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 33% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 6 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
4/4/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.