Sumerian Scriptum Synthesis Publisher

Baqubah, Diyala, Iraq · Member ID: 49579 · 40 total works

Global Rank

#2,949

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 10%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2947PT. Graha Primera Saintifika(37 pts)#2948Academicians-Gate for Advancement of Scholarly Research (Private), Limited(37 pts)#2950Gridnitsa LLC(37 pts)#2951The Korean Medical Library Association(37 pts)

Nexus Score

36/ 100

+6 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#3,917

35 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,949

5 works

Ranked #3,917 for recent publications vs #2,949 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

12.0 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

7.2 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.9 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

16.2 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	56	C	85%	76%	0%	0%	100%
Monographs	20	F	0%	50%	25%	0%	30%
Grant	20	F	0%	0%	0%	100%	0%
Edited Books	19	F	2%	46%	23%	0%	30%
Reference Books	16	F	0%	50%	0%	0%	30%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	43%	6.4 / 15	Needs Work
Update Policies provenance	43%	2.1 / 5	Needs Work
Similarity Check provenance	49%	2.4 / 5	Needs Work
ORCID Coverage people	71%	14.3 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	11%	0.6 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	11%	1.1 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	46%	3.2 / 7	Needs Work
Full-text Links access	46%	3.2 / 7	Needs Work
Abstracts access	100%	6.0 / 6	Excellent

Your journal articles score 56 (Grade C) — strong work on your primary research outputs! The tips below reflect your aggregate coverage across all content types, where there's still room to grow.

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+11 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 6% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+9 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 36% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Sumerian Scriptum Synthesis Publisher

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve People

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Author Affiliations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results