Gridnitsa LLC

Vladimir, Vladimir, Russia · Member ID: 49947 · 51 total works

Global Rank

#2,950

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 10%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2948Academicians-Gate for Advancement of Scholarly Research (Private), Limited(37 pts)#2949Sumerian Scriptum Synthesis Publisher(37 pts)#2951The Korean Medical Library Association(37 pts)#2952East European Scientific Studies Center(37 pts)

Nexus Score

37/ 100

+10 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#3,475

47 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,950

4 works

Ranked #3,475 for recent publications vs #2,950 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

9.0 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

17.4 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.1 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

7.7 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	46	D	46%	81%	36%	0%	65%
Book Chapters	42	D	60%	100%	0%	0%	35%
Posted Content	25	F	0%	100%	33%	0%	0%
Edited Books	20	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	70%	10.5 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	74%	14.9 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	91%	4.6 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	4%	0.4 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	91%	6.4 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	91%	5.5 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+11 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 36% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+9 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 21% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Gridnitsa LLC

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Enable Crossmark

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results