RN Score

The Korean Society of Wood Science Technology

Seoul, South Korea · Member ID: 3629 · 1,018 total works

Nexus Score

49/ 100
D
+39 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#135

69

108 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#654

30

910 works

Ranked #135 for recent publications vs #654 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

23.1 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

11.9 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

5.4 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

8.7 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

All works are journal articles — the aggregate score above is accurate.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

100%
15.0 / 15Excellent

Update Policies

provenance

100%
5.0 / 5Excellent

Similarity Check

provenance

100%
5.0 / 5Excellent

ORCID Coverage

people

100%
20.0 / 20Excellent

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

ROR IDs

organizations

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Funder Registry

funding

56%
5.6 / 10Good

Award Numbers

funding

40%
4.0 / 10Needs Work

Licenses

access

100%
7.0 / 7Excellent

Full-text Links

access

100%
7.0 / 7Excellent

Abstracts

access

0%
0.0 / 6Poor

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

2

Improve Funding

+11 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 27% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
3

Improve Access

+7 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 44% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
4/4/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.