RN Score

Sociedade Paranaense de Matemática

Maringa, Parana, Brazil · Member ID: 3257 · 1,816 total works

Nexus Score

48/ 100
D
+11 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#906

54

785 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#653

43

1,031 works

Ranked #906 for recent publications vs #653 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

19.8 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

6.6 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

6.6 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.7 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

14.7 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content TypeScoreGrade
Journal ArticlesTOP48D
Journal Issues1F
Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.
Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

100%
15.0 / 15Excellent

Update Policies

provenance

37%
1.8 / 5Needs Work

Similarity Check

provenance

99%
5.0 / 5Excellent

ORCID Coverage

people

30%
6.0 / 20Needs Work

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

79%
3.9 / 5Good

ROR IDs

organizations

73%
7.3 / 10Good

Funder Registry

funding

2%
0.2 / 10Poor

Award Numbers

funding

2%
0.2 / 10Poor

Licenses

access

100%
7.0 / 7Excellent

Full-text Links

access

20%
1.4 / 7Poor

Abstracts

access

99%
5.9 / 6Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Funding

+15 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

2

Improve People

+9 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 33% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
3

Improve Organizations

+5 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 44% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 6 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
4/4/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.