Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)

Stevenage, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom · Member ID: 265 · 303,870 total works

Global Rank

#5,796

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 21%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+11

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#5794American Society of Hematology(26 pts)#5795Chem-Bio Informatics Society(26 pts)#5797Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)(26 pts)#5798Japanese Society of Animal Reproduction(26 pts)

Nexus Score

26/ 100

+12 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#5,961

19,048 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#5,796

284,822 works

Ranked #5,961 for recent publications vs #5,796 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

11.1 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

4.5 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.3 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

2.4 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

4.9 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	27	F	59%	11%	20%	9%	25%
Books	5	F	20%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Book Chapters	5	F	18%	0%	3%	0%	0%
Monographs	3	F	10%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Other	3	F	8%	0%	7%	0%	0%
Proceedings	1	F	2%	0%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	39%	5.8 / 15	Needs Work
Update Policies provenance	39%	2.0 / 5	Needs Work
Similarity Check provenance	51%	2.5 / 5	Good
ORCID Coverage people	39%	7.7 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	89%	4.5 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	18%	1.9 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	17%	1.7 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	40%	2.8 / 7	Needs Work
Full-text Links access	15%	1.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	39%	2.3 / 6	Needs Work

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+14 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 12% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+11 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 23% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+11 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 24% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve People

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Full-Text URLs

Add Funder Information

Increase ORCID Coverage

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results