American Society of Hematology

Washington, DC, United States · Member ID: 234 · 203,178 total works

Global Rank

#5,794

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 21%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+11

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#5792Japanese Physical Therapy Association(26 pts)#5793Royal College of Psychiatrists(26 pts)#5795Chem-Bio Informatics Society(26 pts)#5796Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)(26 pts)

Nexus Score

26/ 100

+3 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#7,360

20,644 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#5,794

182,534 works

Ranked #7,360 for recent publications vs #5,794 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

13.1 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

2.2 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

4.8 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

5.5 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	24	F	53%	6%	31%	0%	26%
Book Chapters	15	F	52%	0%	14%	0%	0%
Books	5	F	0%	0%	33%	0%	0%
Edited Books	2	F	0%	0%	11%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	18%	2.7 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
Similarity Check provenance	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	17%	3.4 / 20	Poor
Affiliations (Text) organizations	99%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	5%	0.4 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	91%	5.5 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+14 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 11% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+10 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 28% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

American Society of Hematology

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve People

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Increase ORCID Coverage

Deposit Complete References

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Add License Information

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results