Progettinrete Srl

Firenze, Italy · Member ID: 21583 · 6,638 total works

Global Rank

#6,023

of 28,379

Percentile

Top 21%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+11

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#6021Revista Interacao Interdisciplinar(26 pts)#6022Hospital de Especialidades Carlos Andrade Marin(26 pts)#6024Mulawarman University - Agricultural Faculty(26 pts)#6025A.N.Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution RAS - IEE RAS(26 pts)

Nexus Score

26/ 100

+5 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#6,876

2,303 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#6,023

4,335 works

Ranked #6,876 for recent publications vs #6,023 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

2.9 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

10.1 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.3 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

10.1 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Edited BooksTOP	35	D	0%	75%	23%	0%	81%
Books	34	F	0%	75%	25%	0%	74%
Book Chapters	31	F	0%	51%	28%	0%	82%
Datasets	30	F	18%	69%	33%	0%	35%
Monographs	26	F	5%	44%	17%	6%	62%
Peer Reviews	25	F	0%	100%	33%	0%	0%
Journal Articles	17	F	2%	7%	2%	0%	72%
Database	10	F	0%	36%	12%	0%	3%
Posted Content	3	F	3%	10%	2%	0%	2%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	1%	0.2 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	48%	2.4 / 5	Needs Work
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	61%	12.2 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	62%	3.1 / 5	Good
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	98%	6.9 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	25%	1.7 / 7	Needs Work
Abstracts access	37%	2.2 / 6	Needs Work

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Provenance

+17 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 11% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+9 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 22% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Progettinrete Srl

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Provenance

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Add Full-Text URLs

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results