Revista Interacao Interdisciplinar

Brazil · Member ID: 21344 · 161 total works

Global Rank

#6,021

of 28,379

Percentile

Top 21%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+11

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#6019INMA Bucharest-Romania(26 pts)#6020Scientific Research Center of Environmental Engineering and Construction(26 pts)#6022Hospital de Especialidades Carlos Andrade Marin(26 pts)#6023Progettinrete Srl(26 pts)

Nexus Score

26/ 100

+6 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#6,875

111 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#6,021

50 works

Ranked #6,875 for recent publications vs #6,021 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

4.7 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

6.9 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

2.1 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

12.3 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	29	F	20%	40%	22%	0%	65%
Monographs	26	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	30%
Proceedings	14	F	0%	40%	0%	0%	30%
Edited Books	2	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	10%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	1%	0.1 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	85%	4.2 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	45%	9.0 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	34%	1.7 / 5	Needs Work
ROR IDs organizations	25%	2.5 / 10	Needs Work
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	85%	5.9 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	93%	5.6 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+15 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 19% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+10 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 14% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Revista Interacao Interdisciplinar

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add Funder Information

Add License Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Enable Crossmark

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results