Virtus Interpress

Sumy, Ukraine · Member ID: 9787 · 7,034 total works

Global Rank

#36

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 0%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#34Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology(65 pts)#35Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing(65 pts)#37Sapientia Publishing Group(65 pts)#38Centros de Integracion Juvenil, A.C.(65 pts)

Nexus Score

65/ 100

+14 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#71

1,518 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#36

5,516 works

Ranked #71 for recent publications vs #36 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

19.5 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

18.2 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

7.5 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.8 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

18.7 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	62	C	79%	88%	30%	3%	98%
Proceedings	44	D	59%	90%	4%	0%	52%
Book Chapters	33	F	50%	100%	0%	0%	0%
Monographs	29	F	10%	100%	0%	0%	30%
Edited Books	24	F	11%	86%	0%	0%	21%
Books	5	F	20%	0%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	98%	14.7 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	99%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	97%	19.3 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	92%	4.6 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	87%	8.8 / 10	Excellent
Funder Registry funding	2%	0.2 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	9%	0.9 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	91%	6.3 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	85%	5.9 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	98%	5.8 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+15 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 4% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+5 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 50% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+1 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 78% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Virtus Interpress

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve Provenance

Improvement Recommendations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Enable Crossmark

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results