Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Sharjah, United Arab Emirates · Member ID: 965 · 204,074 total works

Global Rank

#3,975

of 28,608

Percentile

Top 14%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#3973HRL Journal Service(33 pts)#3974Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)(32 pts)#3976American Accounting Association(32 pts)#3977American Dental Society of Anesthesiology (ADSA)(32 pts)

Nexus Score

31/ 100

+25 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#3,202

30,097 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#3,975

173,977 works

Ranked #3,202 for recent publications vs #3,975 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

12.8 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

4.7 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.1 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

2.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

8.3 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	24	F	45%	16%	14%	9%	30%
Edited Books	9	F	0%	0%	26%	0%	24%
Monographs	7	F	0%	0%	21%	0%	20%
Book Chapters	7	F	11%	0%	14%	0%	13%
Books	1	F	0%	0%	2%	0%	2%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	62%	9.2 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	76%	3.8 / 5	Good
Similarity Check provenance	76%	3.8 / 5	Good
ORCID Coverage people	37%	7.4 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	92%	4.6 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	14%	1.4 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	14%	1.4 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	12%	0.8 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	76%	5.3 / 7	Good
Abstracts access	99%	6.0 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+14 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 10% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+11 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 23% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+9 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 21% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve People

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Add License Information

Increase ORCID Coverage

Deposit Complete References

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results