Verein zur Forderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften

Zurich, Switzerland · Member ID: 9598 · 2,130 total works

Global Rank

#59

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 0%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#57Korean Society of Stress Medicine(63 pts)#58The Korean Balance Society(63 pts)#60Korean Society of Laryngology, Phoniatrics and Logopedics(63 pts)#61The Korean Society of Nephrology(63 pts)

Nexus Score

63/ 100

+7 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#200

839 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#59

1,291 works

Ranked #200 for recent publications vs #59 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

19.2 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

7.7 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

5.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

11.9 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

19.3 / 20

Score by Content Type

All works are journal articles — the aggregate score above is accurate.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	100%	15.0 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	36%	7.2 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	73%	7.3 / 10	Good
Award Numbers funding	73%	7.3 / 10	Good
Licenses access	100%	7.0 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	99%	6.9 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	99%	5.9 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve People

+8 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 38% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+7 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 33% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+4 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 60% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Verein zur Forderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve People

Improve Organizations

Improve Funding

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Enable Similarity Check

Increase ORCID Coverage

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results