American Society of Agronomy

Madison, WI, United States · Member ID: 901 · 1 total works

Global Rank

#10,084

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 36%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+17

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#10082Society of Rheology Japan(20 pts)#10083Psychologia Society(20 pts)#10085Japan Poultry Science Association(20 pts)#10086Japan Neurosurgical Society(20 pts)

Nexus Score

20/ 100

-39 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

0 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#10,084

1 works

Recent publications score 39 points lower than historical average

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

10.0 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

0.0 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

2.5 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

7.0 / 20

Score by Content Type

All works are journal articles — the aggregate score above is accurate.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	0%	0.0 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	0%	0.0 / 20	Poor
Affiliations (Text) organizations	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	0%	0.0 / 6	Poor

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve People

+16 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+10 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 40% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 11 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source: Crossref /members API
Last Updated: 3/26/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Crossref Participation Report View Raw API Data

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.