RN Score

Primakov Institute of World Economy and International Relations

Moscow, Russia · Member ID: 8681 · 6,306 total works

Global Rank

#6,451

of 28,501

Percentile

Top 23%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nexus Score

25/ 100
F
+27 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#4,646

38

593 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#6,451

12

5,713 works

Ranked #4,646 for recent publications vs #6,451 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

4.7 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

11.1 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

4.3 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

4.9 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content TypeScoreGrade
BooksTOP16F
Journal Articles14F
Monographs11F
Edited Books3F
Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.
Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

62%
9.3 / 15Good

Update Policies

provenance

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

Similarity Check

provenance

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

ORCID Coverage

people

92%
18.4 / 20Excellent

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

92%
4.6 / 5Excellent

ROR IDs

organizations

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Funder Registry

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Award Numbers

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Licenses

access

0%
0.0 / 7Poor

Full-text Links

access

0%
0.0 / 7Poor

Abstracts

access

100%
6.0 / 6Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

2

Improve Provenance

+15 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 19% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
3

Improve Access

+11 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 24% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 8 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
4/30/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.