Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Poznan, Poland · Member ID: 8568 · 1,315 total works

Global Rank

#10,247

of 28,364

Percentile

Top 36%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+18

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#10245Universitas Jenderal Soedirman(20 pts)#10246The Quantitative Methods for Psychology(20 pts)#10248Universite de Bordeaux(20 pts)#10249Sumy State University(20 pts)

Nexus Score

19/ 100

+8 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#10,030

138 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#10,247

1,177 works

Ranked #10,030 for recent publications vs #10,247 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

2.9 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

7.8 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

8.7 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	16	F	11%	28%	0%	0%	39%
Books	6	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	30%
Edited Books	6	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	30%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	6%	0.9 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	45%	2.3 / 5	Needs Work
ORCID Coverage people	52%	10.4 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	49%	3.5 / 7	Needs Work
Full-text Links access	45%	3.1 / 7	Needs Work
Abstracts access	56%	3.4 / 6	Good

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Provenance

+17 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 11% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Provenance

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Author Affiliations

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results