Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)

Moscow, Russia · Member ID: 8249 · 4,884 total works

Global Rank

#5,850

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 21%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+11

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#5848Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas(26 pts)#5849Universitas Pelita Harapan(26 pts)#5851Kaygi(26 pts)#5852IRA Academico Research(26 pts)

Nexus Score

26/ 100

+19 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#5,243

835 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#5,850

4,049 works

Ranked #5,243 for recent publications vs #5,850 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

8.7 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

10.3 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.1 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.1 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

4.0 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	33	F	46%	61%	27%	2%	24%
Book Series	10	F	0%	33%	11%	0%	10%
Edited Books	9	F	0%	22%	0%	0%	23%
Book Chapters	1	F	0%	2%	0%	0%	3%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	77%	11.5 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	74%	14.8 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	80%	4.0 / 5	Good
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	88%	5.3 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 1% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+12 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 20% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+11 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 35% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Access

Improve Provenance

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Add License Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Include Award/Grant Numbers

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results