Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Arquitetura e Urbanismo - Univ. de Brasilia

Brazil · Member ID: 8043 · 746 total works

Global Rank

#3,019

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 11%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#3017European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC)(36 pts)#3018International Review of Economics and Management(36 pts)#3020Gazi Academic View(36 pts)#3021SDU Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences(36 pts)

Nexus Score

35/ 100

+12 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#3,480

125 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#3,019

621 works

Ranked #3,480 for recent publications vs #3,019 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

5.0 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

12.2 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.6 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.1 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

17.5 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	32	F	21%	41%	1%	0%	90%
Edited Books	13	F	10%	50%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	5%	0.7 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	79%	4.0 / 5	Good
ORCID Coverage people	91%	18.2 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	15%	0.8 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	5%	0.5 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	1%	0.1 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	2%	0.2 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	81%	5.7 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	79%	5.5 / 7	Good
Abstracts access	100%	6.0 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 1% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+15 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 20% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+11 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 4% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Arquitetura e Urbanismo - Univ. de Brasilia

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Author Affiliations

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results