RN Score

Fundacao Carlos Chagas

Brazil · Member ID: 7510 · 1,038 total works

Nexus Score

39/ 100
D
+22 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#1,428

50

121 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,402

28

917 works

Ranked #1,428 for recent publications vs #2,402 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

12.3 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

11.3 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

15.4 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content TypeScoreGrade
Journal ArticlesTOP31F
Reports25F
Book Chapters21F
Edited Books17F
Books10F
Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.
Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

78%
11.7 / 15Good

Update Policies

provenance

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

Similarity Check

provenance

80%
4.0 / 5Excellent

ORCID Coverage

people

92%
18.4 / 20Excellent

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

ROR IDs

organizations

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Funder Registry

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Award Numbers

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Licenses

access

80%
5.6 / 7Excellent

Full-text Links

access

80%
5.6 / 7Excellent

Abstracts

access

83%
5.0 / 6Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

2

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

3

Improve Provenance

+8 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 49% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 8 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
3/27/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.