Institute of Biochemistry

Moscow, Russia · Member ID: 7443 · 1,202 total works

Global Rank

#5,841

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 21%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+11

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#5839Maria Curie-Sklodowska University(26 pts)#5840Non Profit Partnership Polis (Political Studies)(26 pts)#5842Corporation Universidad de la Costa, CUC(26 pts)#5843IU Indianapolis University Library(26 pts)

Nexus Score

26/ 100

Stable vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#7,730

147 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#5,841

1,055 works

Ranked #7,730 for recent publications vs #5,841 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

14.8 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

0.0 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

4.9 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

6.0 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	26	F	60%	0%	33%	0%	30%
Reference Books	6	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	30%
Books	5	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	25%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	98%	14.7 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	0%	0.0 / 20	Poor
Affiliations (Text) organizations	98%	4.9 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	100%	6.0 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve People

+16 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+10 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 30% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Institute of Biochemistry

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve People

Improve Funding

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Increase ORCID Coverage

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Add License Information

Add Full-Text URLs

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results