Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Washington, DC, United States · Member ID: 6751 · 4,868 total works

Global Rank

#81

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 0%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#79The Korean Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (KAMJE)(62 pts)#80The Korean Society for Clinical Laboratory Science(62 pts)#82The Korean Society of Blood Transfusion(62 pts)#83Moscow State University of Psychology and Education(62 pts)

Nexus Score

62/ 100

+3 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#299

488 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#81

4,380 works

Ranked #299 for recent publications vs #81 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

16.4 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

11.3 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

14.5 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

19.6 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	61	C	67%	46%	98%	0%	100%
Journals	19	F	20%	0%	0%	0%	70%
Reports	10	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	50%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	73%	10.9 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	99%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	69%	13.8 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	95%	4.8 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	95%	9.5 / 10	Excellent
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	100%	7.0 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	89%	6.2 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	100%	6.0 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+5 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 56% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+4 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 66% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve People

Improve Provenance

Improvement Recommendations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Enable Crossmark

Deposit Complete References

Increase ORCID Coverage

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results