University of Oklahoma Libraries

Norman, OK, United States · Member ID: 6735 · 1,423 total works

Global Rank

#3,720

of 28,608

Percentile

Top 13%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#3718University of Westminster Press(33 pts)#3719Universidad Simon Bolivar(33 pts)#3721Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences(33 pts)#3722Hipatia Press(33 pts)

Nexus Score

33/ 100

+12 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#4,331

185 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#3,720

1,238 works

Ranked #4,331 for recent publications vs #3,720 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

12.1 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

3.0 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

17.6 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	29	F	41%	7%	0%	0%	89%
Datasets	18	F	0%	70%	0%	0%	19%
Database	10	F	0%	50%	0%	0%	0%
Proceedings	6	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	29%
Edited Books	6	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	30%
Reference Books	4	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	20%
Monographs	3	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	14%
Posted Content	1	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	7%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	72%	10.9 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	94%	4.7 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	24%	4.8 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	88%	6.1 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	94%	6.5 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	98%	5.9 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+13 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 15% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

University of Oklahoma Libraries

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve People

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Increase ORCID Coverage

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Author Affiliations

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results