University of Bialystok

Bialystok, Podlaskie, Poland · Member ID: 6101 · 9,962 total works

Global Rank

#3,714

of 28,608

Percentile

Top 13%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#3712Center of Physical Chemical Methods of Research and Analysis(33 pts)#3713Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Vicerectorado de Investigacion(33 pts)#3715Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies (JAFES)(33 pts)#3716FORMATH Research Group(33 pts)

Nexus Score

33/ 100

+20 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#3,414

1,171 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#3,714

8,791 works

Ranked #3,414 for recent publications vs #3,714 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

14.4 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

12.5 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.4 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

5.3 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
MonographsTOP	35	D	76%	64%	0%	0%	17%
Book Chapters	34	F	48%	90%	0%	0%	21%
Reports	31	F	20%	100%	0%	0%	30%
Edited Books	29	F	38%	92%	0%	0%	5%
Journal Articles	26	F	53%	40%	1%	0%	23%
Proceedings	24	F	41%	60%	0%	0%	11%
Books	23	F	10%	100%	0%	0%	0%
Posted Content	7	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	35%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	81%	12.2 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	95%	4.8 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	92%	18.5 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	14%	0.7 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	15%	1.1 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	5%	0.3 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	86%	5.2 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 3% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+11 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 26% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

University of Bialystok

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Add License Information

Add Full-Text URLs

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results