University of Texas at San Antonio

San Antonio, TX, United States · Member ID: 5875 · 128 total works

Global Rank

#11,109

of 28,608

Percentile

Top 39%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+18

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#11107Athabasca University Press(19 pts)#11108McMaster University Library(19 pts)#11110University Library of Pecs(19 pts)#11111KMK Scientific Press(19 pts)

Nexus Score

19/ 100

+34 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#5,189

6 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#11,109

122 works

Ranked #5,189 for recent publications vs #11,109 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

0.0 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

10.3 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

2.7 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

2.7 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

3.1 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
ReportsTOP	50	C	0%	100%	83%	58%	30%
Monographs	21	F	0%	80%	0%	0%	24%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	0%	0.0 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	100%	20.0 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	33%	1.7 / 5	Needs Work
ROR IDs organizations	33%	3.3 / 10	Needs Work
Funder Registry funding	33%	3.3 / 10	Needs Work
Award Numbers funding	17%	1.7 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	100%	6.0 / 6	Excellent

Your reports score 50 (Grade C) — strong work on your primary research outputs! The tips below reflect your aggregate coverage across all content types, where there's still room to grow.

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Provenance

+20 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+13 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 13% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+13 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 16% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

University of Texas at San Antonio

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Provenance

Improve Funding

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add License Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Enable Crossmark

Enable Similarity Check

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results