RN Score

Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University

Poltava, Poltava Region, Ukraine · Member ID: 5662 · 2,834 total works

Nexus Score

36/ 100
D
Stable vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#4,629

37

907 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,990

35

1,927 works

Ranked #4,629 for recent publications vs #2,990 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

13.3 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

17.5 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.4 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

4.8 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content TypeScoreGrade
Journal ArticlesTOP36D
Books6F
Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.
Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

83%
12.5 / 15Excellent

Update Policies

provenance

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

Similarity Check

provenance

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

ORCID Coverage

people

90%
18.0 / 20Excellent

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

6%
0.3 / 5Poor

ROR IDs

organizations

4%
0.4 / 10Poor

Funder Registry

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Award Numbers

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Licenses

access

0%
0.0 / 7Poor

Full-text Links

access

0%
0.0 / 7Poor

Abstracts

access

93%
5.6 / 6Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

2

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

3

Improve Access

+11 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 24% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 9 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
3/27/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.