BioAcademic Press

ChiangRai, Thailand · Member ID: 54896 · 557 total works

Global Rank

#192

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 1%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#190Sociedad Venezolana de Ecologia(58 pts)#191University of Media, Arts and Communication(58 pts)#193Public Library of Science (PLoS)(57 pts)#194Landscape Online(57 pts)

Nexus Score

58/ 100

+30 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#62

39 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#192

518 works

Ranked #62 for recent publications vs #192 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

22.7 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

9.8 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.4 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

10.4 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

14.3 / 20

Score by Content Type

All works are journal articles — the aggregate score above is accurate.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	95%	14.2 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	97%	4.9 / 5	Excellent
Similarity Check provenance	95%	4.7 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	82%	16.4 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	5%	0.3 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	5%	0.5 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	82%	8.2 / 10	Excellent
Award Numbers funding	85%	8.5 / 10	Excellent
Licenses access	95%	6.6 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	95%	6.6 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	26%	1.5 / 6	Needs Work

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 3% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+6 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 49% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+6 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 52% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

BioAcademic Press

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Organizations

Improve People

Improve Funding

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Include Author Affiliations

Include Abstracts

Deposit Complete References

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results