University of Szeged

Szeged, Hungary · Member ID: 5401 · 8,304 total works

Global Rank

#1,175

of 28,501

Percentile

Top 4%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#1173Instituto Nacional de Salud (Colombia)(46 pts)#1174Yeungnam University College of Medicine(46 pts)#1176Korean Society for Quality in Health Care(46 pts)#1177Avanti Publishers(46 pts)

Nexus Score

46/ 100

+29 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#411

1,538 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#1,175

6,766 works

Ranked #411 for recent publications vs #1,175 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

13.7 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

11.9 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

8.1 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

2.8 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

9.7 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Reference BooksTOP	65	B	60%	67%	11%	100%	77%
Posted Content	65	B	40%	100%	100%	50%	48%
Proceedings	44	D	51%	66%	35%	32%	31%
Book Chapters	43	D	56%	51%	51%	5%	52%
Monographs	36	D	41%	39%	33%	14%	49%
Journal Articles	36	D	49%	45%	34%	6%	42%
Edited Books	35	D	25%	55%	46%	6%	49%
Dissertations	23	F	21%	37%	59%	0%	5%
Books	15	F	20%	13%	0%	0%	39%
Proceedings	6	F	10%	0%	0%	0%	15%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	73%	11.0 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	80%	15.9 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	89%	4.5 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	81%	8.1 / 10	Excellent
Funder Registry funding	24%	2.4 / 10	Needs Work
Award Numbers funding	21%	2.1 / 10	Needs Work
Licenses access	12%	0.8 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	89%	6.2 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	80%	4.8 / 6	Excellent

Your reference books score 65 (Grade B) — strong work on your primary research outputs! The tips below reflect your aggregate coverage across all content types, where there's still room to grow.

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+13 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 14% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+6 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 55% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+6 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 48% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

University of Szeged

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Add License Information

Enable Crossmark

Add Funder Information

Deposit Complete References

Include Award/Grant Numbers

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results