Cancer Research Malaysia

Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia · Member ID: 53777 · 7 total works

Global Rank

#10,045

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 36%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+16

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#10043Universidad Europea(21 pts)#10044Department of Wildlife and National Parks Peninsular Malaysia(21 pts)#10046EduTech Press Group Co., Limited(21 pts)#10047Yayasan ADA Research Center(21 pts)

Nexus Score

21/ 100

-42 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

0 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#10,045

7 works

Recent publications score 42 points lower than historical average

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

0.0 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

10.0 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

7.5 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

3.5 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
DatasetsTOP	42	D	0%	100%	100%	0%	35%
Database	10	F	0%	0%	67%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	0%	0.0 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	0%	0.0 / 20	Poor
Affiliations (Text) organizations	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	0%	0.0 / 6	Poor

Your datasets score 42 (Grade D) — strong work on your primary research outputs! The tips below reflect your aggregate coverage across all content types, where there's still room to grow.

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Provenance

+20 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+12 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 18% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Cancer Research Malaysia

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Provenance

Improve Funding

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Increase ORCID Coverage

Deposit Complete References

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Add License Information

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results