MGIMO University Publishing House

Moscow, Russia, Russia · Member ID: 53211 · 99 total works

Global Rank

#10,033

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 36%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#10031DPP Gerakan Pembumian Pancasila(21 pts)#10032Prisma Journal(21 pts)#10034Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Kuala Kapuas(21 pts)#10035Universitas Wijayaksuma Purwokerto - Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian(21 pts)

Nexus Score

42/ 100

+42 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#3,389

99 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#10,033

0 works

Ranked #3,389 for recent publications vs #10,033 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

16.2 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

13.7 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

7.9 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

4.5 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
BooksTOP	47	D	66%	81%	55%	0%	30%
Book Chapters	28	F	60%	29%	47%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	99%	14.8 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	27%	1.4 / 5	Needs Work
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	69%	13.7 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	5%	0.3 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	77%	7.7 / 10	Good
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	75%	4.5 / 6	Good

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+12 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 22% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+4 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 65% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

MGIMO University Publishing House

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Access

Improve Provenance

Improvement Recommendations

Add Funder Information

Add License Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Author Affiliations

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results