Veterinary World

Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand · Member ID: 5308 · 4,110 total works

Global Rank

#78

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 0%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#76The Korean Society for Legal Medicine (KAMJE)(62 pts)#77Korean Society of Developmental Biology(62 pts)#79The Korean Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (KAMJE)(62 pts)#80The Korean Society for Clinical Laboratory Science(62 pts)

Nexus Score

62/ 100

+24 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#58

847 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#78

3,263 works

Ranked #58 for recent publications vs #78 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

22.4 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

14.2 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

4.7 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

8.2 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

12.5 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	55	C	84%	56%	25%	36%	61%
Journal Issues	4	F	15%	0%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	99%	14.9 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
Similarity Check provenance	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	97%	19.5 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	15%	1.6 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	48%	4.8 / 10	Needs Work
Award Numbers funding	51%	5.1 / 10	Good
Licenses access	100%	7.0 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	100%	6.0 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+8 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 41% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+7 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 32% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+4 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 62% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Veterinary World

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Add Full-Text URLs

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results