White Horse Press - Open Access Books

Edinburgh, United Kingdom · Member ID: 52672 · 59 total works

Global Rank

#6,317

of 28,501

Percentile

Top 22%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#6315Academia Nacional de Evaluadores de México AC(26 pts)#6316Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - Centro de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas(26 pts)#6318Nature and Information Engineering Publishing Sdn. Bhd.(26 pts)#6319WB Educação(26 pts)

Nexus Score

52/ 100

+52 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#1,202

59 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#6,317

0 works

Ranked #1,202 for recent publications vs #6,317 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

5.4 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

14.2 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

13.4 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

8.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

10.8 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
MonographsTOP	75	B	40%	100%	100%	50%	100%
Edited Books	75	B	40%	100%	100%	50%	100%
Book Chapters	50	C	20%	69%	88%	39%	50%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	0%	0.0 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
Similarity Check provenance	8%	0.4 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	71%	14.2 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	92%	4.6 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	88%	8.8 / 10	Excellent
Funder Registry funding	53%	5.3 / 10	Good
Award Numbers funding	27%	2.7 / 10	Needs Work
Licenses access	100%	7.0 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	8%	0.6 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	54%	3.3 / 6	Good

Your monographs score 75 (Grade B) — strong work on your primary research outputs! The tips below reflect your aggregate coverage across all content types, where there's still room to grow.

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Provenance

+15 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 22% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+8 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 40% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+5 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 54% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

White Horse Press - Open Access Books

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Provenance

Improve Funding

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add Full-Text URLs

Enable Similarity Check

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Abstracts

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results