RN Score

Akademia Muzyczna im. Stanisława Moniuszki w Gdańsku

Gdańsk, Polska, Poland · Member ID: 52185 · 18 total works

Nexus Score

38/ 100
D
+5 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#3,906

40

8 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,751

36

10 works

Ranked #3,906 for recent publications vs #2,751 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

11.4 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

18.0 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

2.5 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

6.0 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content TypeScoreGrade
Book ChaptersTOP39D
Edited Books29F
Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.
Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

63%
9.4 / 15Good

Update Policies

provenance

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

Similarity Check

provenance

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

ORCID Coverage

people

100%
20.0 / 20Excellent

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

100%
5.0 / 5Excellent

ROR IDs

organizations

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Funder Registry

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Award Numbers

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Licenses

access

0%
0.0 / 7Poor

Full-text Links

access

0%
0.0 / 7Poor

Abstracts

access

100%
6.0 / 6Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

2

Improve Access

+10 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 30% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
3

Improve Provenance

+9 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 46% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 8 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
3/26/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.