Nobel Tip Kitabevleri

Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey · Member ID: 50455 · 757 total works

Global Rank

#109

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 0%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#107Scientific Research Establishment of Innovations for Future LLC (Publications)(61 pts)#108International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Smart Technology of Korean Society for Precision Engineering(61 pts)#110Eco Astronomy Inc(61 pts)#111American Geophysical Union (AGU)(60 pts)

Nexus Score

61/ 100

Stable vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#381

630 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#109

127 works

Ranked #381 for recent publications vs #109 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

14.5 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

19.9 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

13.9 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

12.7 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
MonographsTOP	69	B	74%	100%	91%	0%	85%
Book Chapters	61	C	60%	100%	93%	0%	62%
Edited Books	53	C	16%	100%	88%	0%	81%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	91%	13.7 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	7%	0.3 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	100%	19.9 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	99%	4.9 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	90%	8.9 / 10	Excellent
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	99%	6.9 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	7%	0.5 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	93%	5.6 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+6 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 58% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+3 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 63% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Nobel Tip Kitabevleri

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Add Full-Text URLs

Enable Crossmark

Enable Similarity Check

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results