RN Score

Urban Studies Foundation

Glasgow, United Kingdom · Member ID: 50328 · 206 total works

Nexus Score

46/ 100
D
Stable vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#2,495

46

50 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#1,380

45

156 works

Ranked #2,495 for recent publications vs #1,380 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

0.3 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

20.0 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

15.0 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

10.1 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

0.3 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content TypeScoreGrade
Edited BooksTOP78B
Grant45D
Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.
Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

4%
0.6 / 15Poor

Update Policies

provenance

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

Similarity Check

provenance

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

ORCID Coverage

people

100%
20.0 / 20Excellent

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

100%
5.0 / 5Excellent

ROR IDs

organizations

100%
10.0 / 10Excellent

Funder Registry

funding

4%
0.4 / 10Poor

Award Numbers

funding

98%
9.8 / 10Excellent

Licenses

access

4%
0.3 / 7Poor

Full-text Links

access

0%
0.0 / 7Poor

Abstracts

access

4%
0.2 / 6Poor
Your edited books score 78 (Grade B) — strong work on your primary research outputs! The tips below reflect your aggregate coverage across all content types, where there's still room to grow.

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Provenance

+20 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

2

Improve Access

+16 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

3

Improve Funding

+6 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 51% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 7 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
4/25/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.