University of Tartu

Tartu, Estonia · Member ID: 5007 · 4,349 total works

Global Rank

#10,137

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 36%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+17

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#10135Korean Society for Floricultural Science(20 pts)#10136Romanian Association of Balneology(20 pts)#10138Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing(20 pts)#10139Korean Society of International Agriculture(20 pts)

Nexus Score

20/ 100

+9 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#9,064

418 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#10,137

3,931 works

Ranked #9,064 for recent publications vs #10,137 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

4.3 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

3.0 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

12.8 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Edited BooksTOP	23	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	15%
Journal Articles	17	F	17%	6%	0%	0%	58%
Monographs	6	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	30%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	0%	0.0 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	93%	4.7 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	27%	5.3 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	34%	2.4 / 7	Needs Work
Full-text Links access	96%	6.8 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	90%	5.4 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Provenance

+16 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 17% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+13 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 15% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

University of Tartu

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Provenance

Improve Funding

Improve People

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Increase ORCID Coverage

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results