SUP Publishing CIC

Glasgow, United Kingdom · Member ID: 48948 · 37 total works

Global Rank

#3,424

of 28,501

Percentile

Top 12%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#3422PT Delada Cahaya Masagro(35 pts)#3423RRZ Scientific Publishing(35 pts)#3425Associação dos Geógrafos Brasileiros(35 pts)#3426Focus Endocrinology(35 pts)

Nexus Score

69/ 100

+69 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#145

37 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#3,424

0 works

Ranked #145 for recent publications vs #3,424 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

5.5 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

18.4 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

13.9 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

18.4 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

13.3 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Edited BooksTOP	78	B	40%	100%	50%	100%	100%
Book Chapters	70	B	20%	91%	98%	100%	62%
Monographs	56	C	33%	100%	67%	0%	88%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	0%	0.0 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
Similarity Check provenance	11%	0.5 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	92%	18.4 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	95%	4.7 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	92%	9.2 / 10	Excellent
Funder Registry funding	92%	9.2 / 10	Excellent
Award Numbers funding	92%	9.2 / 10	Excellent
Licenses access	100%	7.0 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	11%	0.8 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	92%	5.5 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Provenance

+15 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 22% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+3 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 66% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

SUP Publishing CIC

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Provenance

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add Full-Text URLs

Enable Similarity Check

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results