Sci-thoth

Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador · Member ID: 48274 · 13 total works

Global Rank

#1,717

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 6%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#1715Universidad Arturo Prat(44 pts)#1716Pharaoh Academy International Publishing Co., Limited(44 pts)#1718İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Dış Ticaret Enstitüsü(44 pts)#1719Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Investigación Científica(44 pts)

Nexus Score

44/ 100

-9 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#3,847

6 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#1,717

7 works

Ranked #3,847 for recent publications vs #1,717 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

16.9 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

9.1 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

1.4 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

16.9 / 20

Score by Content Type

All works are journal articles — the aggregate score above is accurate.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	83%	12.5 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	83%	4.2 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	33%	6.7 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	83%	5.8 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	83%	5.8 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	83%	5.0 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+15 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 7% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+7 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 45% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Sci-thoth

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve People

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Author Affiliations

Enable Crossmark

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results