Riga Technical University

Riga, Latvia · Member ID: 4297 · 9,722 total works

Global Rank

#5,518

of 28,501

Percentile

Top 19%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+10

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#5516The Korean Society of Propulsion Engineers(27 pts)#5517University of Massachusetts Medical School(27 pts)#5519Korean Academic Society of Rehabilitation Nursing(27 pts)#5520Institute of Agricultural Science, Chungnam National University(27 pts)

Nexus Score

27/ 100

+11 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#5,842

1,452 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#5,518

8,270 works

Ranked #5,842 for recent publications vs #5,518 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

10.4 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

2.4 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.3 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

14.1 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Reference BooksTOP	31	F	20%	100%	0%	0%	30%
Journal Articles	24	F	37%	8%	4%	0%	62%
Dissertations	24	F	18%	74%	0%	0%	25%
Edited Books	23	F	5%	80%	0%	0%	29%
Proceedings	20	F	79%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Monographs	15	F	4%	62%	0%	0%	10%
Books	8	F	2%	7%	0%	0%	29%
Book Chapters	4	F	4%	2%	0%	0%	11%
Journals	0	F	1%	0%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	52%	7.8 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	92%	4.6 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	16%	3.2 / 20	Poor
Affiliations (Text) organizations	1%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	68%	4.8 / 7	Good
Full-text Links access	90%	6.3 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	99%	6.0 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+14 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 12% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 2% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Riga Technical University

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve People

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Increase ORCID Coverage

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Author Affiliations

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results