Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences

Warszawa, Poland · Member ID: 4157 · 1,518 total works

Global Rank

#2,581

of 28,379

Percentile

Top 9%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2579Zeus Publishing(38 pts)#2580Journal of Advanced Marine Engineering and Technology(38 pts)#2582eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd(38 pts)#2583The Korean Institute of Resources Recycling(38 pts)

Nexus Score

38/ 100

+39 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#700

177 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,581

1,341 works

Ranked #700 for recent publications vs #2,581 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

14.5 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

11.9 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

4.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

7.5 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Edited BooksTOP	28	F	18%	92%	0%	0%	23%
Monographs	26	F	17%	83%	0%	0%	25%
Journal Articles	25	F	44%	38%	11%	0%	25%
Reports	20	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	0%
Book Series	20	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	0%
Proceedings	15	F	14%	57%	0%	0%	0%
Books	13	F	10%	50%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	86%	12.9 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	59%	3.0 / 5	Good
Similarity Check provenance	92%	4.6 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	90%	18.1 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	86%	4.3 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	29%	2.9 / 10	Needs Work
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	89%	6.2 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	87%	5.2 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+8 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 27% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+8 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 38% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Add Funder Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Deposit Complete References

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results