ORAC Kiadó Kft.

Budapest, Hungary · Member ID: 39312 · 544 total works

Global Rank

#2,164

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 8%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2162Journal of Commercial Studies(41 pts)#2163High Yield Medicine(41 pts)#2165Research Bridge Publisher(41 pts)#2166Instituto de Higiene 56(41 pts)

Nexus Score

41/ 100

-15 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#5,323

458 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,164

86 works

Ranked #5,323 for recent publications vs #2,164 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

16.8 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

9.5 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

15.0 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	37	D	61%	46%	0%	0%	61%
Book Chapters	24	F	60%	15%	0%	0%	30%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	90%	13.5 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	22%	1.1 / 5	Needs Work
ORCID Coverage people	44%	8.7 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	33%	2.3 / 7	Needs Work
Full-text Links access	33%	2.3 / 7	Needs Work
Abstracts access	97%	5.8 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+7 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 47% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

ORAC Kiadó Kft.

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve People

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Author Affiliations

Enable Crossmark

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results