Euskaltzaindia

Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain · Member ID: 39286 · 278 total works

Global Rank

#2,730

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 10%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2728El Colegio del Estado de Hidalgo(38 pts)#2729AEBMedicine(38 pts)#2731Academician Abdulla Garayev Institute of Physiology(38 pts)#2732Centro de Investigación Científica e Innovación Académica Profesional(38 pts)

Nexus Score

38/ 100

+36 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#760

38 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,730

240 works

Ranked #760 for recent publications vs #2,730 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

11.7 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

6.0 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.2 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

1.9 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

15.2 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Edited BooksTOP	26	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	30%
Journal Articles	25	F	30%	12%	6%	3%	68%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	84%	12.6 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	55%	11.1 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	47%	2.4 / 5	Needs Work
ROR IDs organizations	39%	4.0 / 10	Needs Work
Funder Registry funding	18%	1.8 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	18%	1.8 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	63%	4.4 / 7	Good
Full-text Links access	100%	7.0 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	100%	6.0 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+14 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 9% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+10 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 30% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+9 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 21% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Euskaltzaindia

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve People

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Add Funder Information

Enable Crossmark

Increase ORCID Coverage

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Author Affiliations

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results