Edeb Erkan

Ankara, Mamak, Turkey · Member ID: 38683 · 245 total works

Global Rank

#2,340

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 8%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2338Telos Publicações e Serviços Ltda(40 pts)#2339Society of Cutaneous Oncology(40 pts)#2341Association for Croatian History(40 pts)#2342Universidade Estadual do Ceará e Sociedade Cearense de Psiquiatria(40 pts)

Nexus Score

40/ 100

+6 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#3,229

139 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,340

106 works

Ranked #3,229 for recent publications vs #2,340 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

11.4 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

17.3 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.2 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

10.8 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	65	B	100%	100%	0%	2%	100%
Book Chapters	26	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	30%
Monographs	20	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	0%
Proceedings	20	F	0%	83%	0%	0%	15%
Edited Books	20	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	48%	7.2 / 15	Needs Work
Update Policies provenance	48%	2.4 / 5	Needs Work
Similarity Check provenance	48%	2.4 / 5	Needs Work
ORCID Coverage people	95%	19.0 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	2%	0.2 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	1%	0.1 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	48%	3.4 / 7	Needs Work
Full-text Links access	48%	3.4 / 7	Needs Work
Abstracts access	78%	4.7 / 6	Good

Your journal articles score 65 (Grade B) — strong work on your primary research outputs! The tips below reflect your aggregate coverage across all content types, where there's still room to grow.

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 1% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+9 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 46% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Edeb Erkan

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve Provenance

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Author Affiliations

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results